On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 07:16:34AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 16:08:55 +0200 Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 08:15:26AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > AR7 is going to be removed from the Kernel, so remove its networking > > > support in form of the cpmac driver. This allows us to remove the > > > platform because this driver includes a platform specific header. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Changes since v1: > > > * added ack > > > > > > MAINTAINERS | 6 - > > > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/Kconfig | 9 +- > > > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/Makefile | 1 - > > > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpmac.c | 1251 ------------------------------ > > > 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1266 deletions(-) > > > delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpmac.c > > > [..] > > > > is it ok for network people to route this patch via mips-next tree > > or do you want to apply to net-next ? > > We have a ".remove callback should return void" conversion from Uwe > queued for the deleted driver (231ea972ccaf5b). The conflict will be > really trivial, but I guess no conflict beats trivial conflict so better > if we take it? :S makes sense, so I'll just apply the other patches. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
