On Mon, 2023-09-18 at 10:29 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> +/**
> + * struct execmem_range - definition of a memory range suitable for
> code and
> + * related data allocations
> + * @start: address space start
> + * @end: address space end (inclusive)
> + * @pgprot: permissions for memory in this address space
> + * @alignment: alignment required for text allocations
> + */
> +struct execmem_range {
> + unsigned long start;
> + unsigned long end;
> + pgprot_t pgprot;
> + unsigned int alignment;
> +};
Not a strong opinion, but range doesn't seem an appropriate name. It
*has* a range, but also other allocation configuration. It gets
especially confusing when multiple "ranges" have the same range. Maybe
execmem_alloc_params?
