On Fri, Aug 11, 2023, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote: > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > index ec169f5c7dce2..00f7bda9202f2 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > @@ -278,16 +278,14 @@ static inline bool kvm_available_flush_remote_tlbs_range(void) > return kvm_x86_ops.flush_remote_tlbs_range; > } > > -void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start_gfn, > - gfn_t nr_pages) > +int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, u64 nr_pages) > { > int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; > > if (kvm_x86_ops.flush_remote_tlbs_range) > - ret = static_call(kvm_x86_flush_remote_tlbs_range)(kvm, start_gfn, > - nr_pages); > - if (ret) > - kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm); > + ret = static_call(kvm_x86_flush_remote_tlbs_range)(kvm, gfn, nr_pages); > + > + return ret; Please write this as if (kvm_x86_ops.flush_remote_tlbs_range) return static_call(kvm_x86_flush_remote_tlbs_range)(kvm, gfn, nr_pages); return -EOPNOTSUPP; or alternatively if (!kvm_x86_ops.flush_remote_tlbs_range) return -EOPNOTSUPP; return static_call(kvm_x86_flush_remote_tlbs_range)(kvm, gfn, nr_pages); Hmm, I'll throw my official vote for the second version. The local "ret" is unnecessary and is suprisingly dangerous. I screwed up the conflict resolution when cherry-picking my CONFIG_HYPERV change to see what the conflict looked like and ended up with a double flush: int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; if (kvm_x86_ops.flush_remote_tlbs_range) ret = static_call(kvm_x86_flush_remote_tlbs_range)(kvm, gfn, nr_pages); if (ret) kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm); return ret; Dropping "ret" makes it much harder to get trigger happy when resolving conflicts. No need for a new version to fix the above, assuming Marc/Oliver is ok doing fixup when applying. Nit aside, looks good for x86, and I know of no conflicts, so take 'er away! Acked-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>