Re: [PATCH 05/10] mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: fix some dtc warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sergio,

On 14.09.2022 12:14, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
Hi Arinc,

On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 10:55 AM Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Fix the dtc warnings below.

/cpus/cpu@0: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mips,mips1004Kc']
/cpus/cpu@1: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mips,mips1004Kc']
uartlite@c00: $nodename:0: 'uartlite@c00' does not match '^serial(@.*)?$'
         From schema: /home/arinc9/Documents/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.yaml
uartlite@c00: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('clock-names' was unexpected)
         From schema: /home/arinc9/Documents/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.yaml
sdhci@1e130000: $nodename:0: 'sdhci@1e130000' does not match '^mmc(@.*)?$'
         From schema: /home/arinc9/Documents/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mtk-sd.yaml
sdhci@1e130000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('bus-width', 'cap-mmc-highspeed', 'cap-sd-highspeed', 'disable-wp', 'max-frequency', 'vmmc-supply', 'vqmmc-supply' were unexpected)
         From schema: /home/arinc9/Documents/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mtk-sd.yaml
xhci@1e1c0000: $nodename:0: 'xhci@1e1c0000' does not match '^usb(@.*)?'
         From schema: /home/arinc9/Documents/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/mediatek,mtk-xhci.yaml
xhci@1e1c0000: compatible: ['mediatek,mt8173-xhci'] is too short
         From schema: /home/arinc9/Documents/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/mediatek,mtk-xhci.yaml
switch0@0: $nodename:0: 'switch0@0' does not match '^(ethernet-)?switch(@.*)?$'
         From schema: /home/arinc9/Documents/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml
port@1: status:0: 'off' is not one of ['okay', 'disabled', 'reserved']
         From schema: /home/arinc9/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/dtschema/schemas/dt-core.yaml
port@2: status:0: 'off' is not one of ['okay', 'disabled', 'reserved']
         From schema: /home/arinc9/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/dtschema/schemas/dt-core.yaml
port@3: status:0: 'off' is not one of ['okay', 'disabled', 'reserved']
         From schema: /home/arinc9/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/dtschema/schemas/dt-core.yaml

- Remove "mips,mips1004Kc" compatible string from the cpu nodes. This
doesn't exist anywhere.
- Change "memc: syscon@5000" to "memc: memory-controller@5000".
- Change "uartlite: uartlite@c00" to "serial0: serial@c00" and remove the
aliases node.
- Remove "clock-names" from the serial0 node. The property doesn't exist on
the 8250.yaml schema.
- Change "sdhci: sdhci@1e130000" to "mmc: mmc@1e130000".
- Change "xhci: xhci@1e1c0000" to "usb: usb@1e1c0000".
- Add "mediatek,mtk-xhci" as the second compatible string on the usb node.
- Change "switch0: switch0@0" to "switch0: switch@0"
- Change "off" to "disabled" for disabled nodes.

Remaining warnings are caused by the lack of json-schema documentation.

/cpuintc: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mti,cpu-interrupt-controller']
/palmbus@1e000000/wdt@100: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mediatek,mt7621-wdt']
/palmbus@1e000000/i2c@900: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mediatek,mt7621-i2c']
/palmbus@1e000000/spi@b00: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['ralink,mt7621-spi']
/ethernet@1e100000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mediatek,mt7621-eth']

Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  .../boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-gnubee-gb-pc1.dts  |  2 +-
  .../boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-gnubee-gb-pc2.dts  |  2 +-
  arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi         | 32 +++++++------------
  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-gnubee-gb-pc1.dts b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-gnubee-gb-pc1.dts
index 24eebc5a85b1..6ecb8165efe8 100644
--- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-gnubee-gb-pc1.dts
+++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-gnubee-gb-pc1.dts
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ system {
         };
  };

-&sdhci {
+&mmc {
         status = "okay";
  };

diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-gnubee-gb-pc2.dts b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-gnubee-gb-pc2.dts
index 34006e667780..2e534ea5bab7 100644
--- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-gnubee-gb-pc2.dts
+++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-gnubee-gb-pc2.dts
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ key-reset {
         };
  };

-&sdhci {
+&mmc {
         status = "okay";
  };

diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi
index ee46ace0bcc1..9302bdc04510 100644
--- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi
+++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi
@@ -15,13 +15,11 @@ cpus {

                 cpu@0 {
                         device_type = "cpu";
-                       compatible = "mips,mips1004Kc";
                         reg = <0>;
                 };

                 cpu@1 {
                         device_type = "cpu";
-                       compatible = "mips,mips1004Kc";
                         reg = <1>;
                 };
         };

Instead of removing this, since compatible is correct here, I think a
cpus yaml file needs to be added to properly define mips CPU's but
compatible strings using all around the sources are a bit messy. Take
a look of how is this done for arm [0]

I did investigate the arm bindings beforehand. I've seen that some of the strings are also checked by code. I don't see the mips strings used anywhere but DTs so I had decided to remove it here. I guess we can make a basic binding to list the mips processor cores.

What do you think Thomas?


@@ -33,11 +31,6 @@ cpuintc: cpuintc {
                 compatible = "mti,cpu-interrupt-controller";
         };

-       aliases {
-               serial0 = &uartlite;
-       };
-
-
         mmc_fixed_3v3: regulator-3v3 {
                 compatible = "regulator-fixed";
                 regulator-name = "mmc_power";
@@ -110,17 +103,16 @@ i2c: i2c@900 {
                         pinctrl-0 = <&i2c_pins>;
                 };

-               memc: syscon@5000 {
+               memc: memory-controller@5000 {
                         compatible = "mediatek,mt7621-memc", "syscon";
                         reg = <0x5000 0x1000>;
                 };


I think syscon nodes need to use 'syscon' in the node name, but I am
not 100% sure.

I've tested this patch series on my GB-PC2, it currently works fine. Also, DT binding for MT7621 memory controller uses memory-controller on the example so I guess it's fine?

Arınç



[Index of Archives]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux