On 23/07/2022 21:27, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 02:47:14AM +0800, Mike Yang wrote: >> On 7/24/22 01:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 23/07/2022 18:50, Zhou Yanjie wrote: > >>>> No offense, does it really need to be named that way? >>>> I can't seem to find documentation with instructions on this :( > > ... > >>> All bindings are to follow this rule, so I don't understand why you >>> think it is an exception for you? > >> Zhou didn't ask you to make an exception. They have a valid >> point and they're asking why. > >> You may want to avoid further incidents of this kind by stop >> being bossy and actually writing a guideline of naming these >> .yaml files and publish it somewhere online. > > Yeah, I do have to say that I was also completely unaware that > there was any enforced convention here. Indeed, it's not a enforced pattern. But there are many other insignificant ones which we also tend to forget during review, like using words "Device Tree bindings" in title or using unnecessary quotes around "refs" (also in ID of schema). It's not a big deal, but I ask when I notice it. Best regards, Krzysztof
