Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: SPI: Add Ingenic SFC bindings.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Krzysztof,

On 2022/7/23 上午1:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 22/07/2022 18:48, 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) wrote:
Add the SFC bindings for the X1000 SoC, the X1600 SoC, the X1830 SoC,
and the X2000 SoC from Ingenic.

Signed-off-by: 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  .../devicetree/bindings/spi/ingenic,sfc.yaml       | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/ingenic,sfc.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/ingenic,sfc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/ingenic,sfc.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b7c4cf4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/ingenic,sfc.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/spi/ingenic,sfc.yaml#
File name should be rather based on first compatible, so
ingenic,x1000-sfc.yaml


No offense, does it really need to be named that way?
I can't seem to find documentation with instructions on this :(

The use of "ingenic,sfc.yaml" indicates that this is the documentation
for the SFC module for all Ingenic SoCs, without misleading people into
thinking it's only for a specific model of SoC. And there seem to be many
other yaml documents that use similar names (eg. fsl,spi-fsl-qspi.yaml,
spi-rockchip.yaml, spi-nxp-fspi.yaml, ingenic,spi.yaml, spi-sifive.yaml,
omap-spi.yaml), maybe these yaml files that are not named with first
compatible are also for the same consideration. :)


+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Bindings for SFC in Ingenic SoCs
+
+maintainers:
+  - 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+
+description:
+  The SPI Flash Controller in Ingenic SoCs.
+
You miss here allOf referencing spi-controller.


Sure, will add it in the next version.


+properties:
+  compatible:
+    oneOf:
+      - enum:
+          - ingenic,x1000-sfc
+          - ingenic,x1600-sfc
+          - ingenic,x2000-sfc
+      - items:
+          - enum:
+              - ingenic,x1830-sfc
+          - const: ingenic,x1000-sfc
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  interrupts:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  clocks:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  clock-names:
+    const: sfc
Remove the clock-names entirely, no benefits.


Sure.


+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - interrupts
+  - clocks
+  - clock-names
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    #include <dt-bindings/clock/ingenic,x1000-cgu.h>
+
+	sfc: spi@13440000 {
+		compatible = "ingenic,x1000-sfc";

Use 4 spaces for example indentation.


My fault, will fix it in the next version.


+		reg = <0x13440000 0x1000>;
+
+		interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
+		interrupts = <7>;
+
+		clocks = <&cgu X1000_CLK_SFC>;
+		clock-names = "sfc";
+
+		status = "disabled";
No status in example.


Sure, will remove it in the next version.


Thanks and beset regards!



+	};
+...

Best regards,
Krzysztof



[Index of Archives]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux