Re: [PATCH v5 11/11] random: insist on random_get_entropy() existing in order to simplify

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sandy,

On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 10:24:07AM +0800, Sandy Harris wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 6:37 AM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > All platforms are now guaranteed to provide some value for
> > random_get_entropy(). In case some bug leads to this not being so, we
> > print a warning, ...
> 
> Would it make sense to test at compile time? If there is no hardware
> RNG nor a cycle counter, then the kernel should be compiled with
> the gcc latent entropy plugin. Generate a warning suggesting that,
> or even an error insisting on it.

Unfortunately, as a last ditch warning safeguard against bugs, I don't
think that's something we can determine at build time. A lot of this
machinery is dynamic. Fortunately a single check at init time brings
with it zero appreciable overhead.

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux