> Am 09.04.2022 um 15:23 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > On 09/04/2022 15:18, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > hould have a specific compatible. >>>> Please mention why it does not. >>> >>> Agreed. The "snps,dwc2" should be a fallback string, otherwise there is no way to uniquely identify the JZ4780 implementation of the IP. >> >> Well, there is no specifc implementation and driver for it. So no need to uniquely identify it. > > Specific implementation and driver are not arguments here. This does not > matter. It's really unrelated argument. The argumentation is in reverse: if there is no need for a specialized driver or implementation, why is there is a need to define a specialization. Your argument was: "there is no way to uniquely identify the JZ4780 implementation of the IP" My question is: "what do we need that for?" > Bindings are not about implementation in Linux. Implementation can > change, so bindings should also? No. Implementations should be agnostic.
