Re: [PATCH 07/18] MIPS: DTS: jz4780: fix otg node as reported by dtbscheck

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/04/2022 20:37, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dtb: usb@13500000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
> 	['ingenic,jz4780-otg', 'snps,dwc2'] is too long
> 	['ingenic,jz4780-otg', 'snps,dwc2'] is too short
> 	'brcm,bcm2835-usb' was expected
> 	'hisilicon,hi6220-usb' was expected
> 	'rockchip,rk3066-usb' was expected
> 	'ingenic,jz4780-otg' is not one of ['rockchip,px30-usb', 'rockchip,rk3036-usb', 'rockchip,rk3188-usb', 'rockchip,rk3228-usb', 'rockchip,rk3288-usb', 'rockchip,rk3308-usb', 'rockchip,rk3328-usb', 'rockchip,rk3368-usb', 'rockchip,rv1108-usb']
> 	'lantiq,arx100-usb' was expected
> 	'lantiq,xrx200-usb' was expected
> 	'ingenic,jz4780-otg' is not one of ['amlogic,meson8-usb', 'amlogic,meson8b-usb', 'amlogic,meson-gxbb-usb', 'amlogic,meson-g12a-usb', 'intel,socfpga-agilex-hsotg']
> 	'amcc,dwc-otg' was expected
> 	'apm,apm82181-dwc-otg' was expected
> 	'snps,dwc2' was expected
> 	'st,stm32f4x9-fsotg' was expected
> 	'st,stm32f4x9-hsotg' was expected
> 	'st,stm32f7-hsotg' was expected
> 	'st,stm32mp15-fsotg' was expected
> 	'st,stm32mp15-hsotg' was expected
> 	'samsung,s3c6400-hsotg' was expected
> 	'intel,socfpga-agilex-hsotg' was expected

You really don't need to paste entire warning.


> 	From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.yaml
> 
> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4780.dtsi | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4780.dtsi b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4780.dtsi
> index 2021836983c96..c5124459678b7 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4780.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4780.dtsi
> @@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ bch: bch@134d0000 {
>  	};
>  
>  	otg: usb@13500000 {
> -		compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-otg", "snps,dwc2";
> +		compatible = "snps,dwc2";

This looks wrong, the block usually should have a specific compatible.
Please mention why it does not.

Best regards,
Best regards,
Krzysztof



[Index of Archives]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux