Re: [PATCH V4 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: convert Broadcom's WDT to the json-schema

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Lee,

> On Tue, 07 Dec 2021, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> 
> > On 12/7/21 2:03 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> > > > It sounded to me like Lee wanted an immutable branch for that
> > > 
> > > Not exactly, I said:
> > > 
> > >    "> Suppose we should take patch #2 via [Watchdog] as well.
> > > 
> > >     If that happens, I would like a PR to an immutable branch."
> > > 
> > > The alternative is that I take the patch and provide an immutable
> > > branch to you, which I am in a position to do.
> > > 
> > 
> > I understand, only I am not in a position to take it since my tree
> > isn't the official watchdog-next tree, and it doesn't show up in -next.
> > If Wim takes it into the official watchdog-next tree or not would be
> > completely up to him.
> > 
> > I personally don't care if the bindings check is clean in my inofficial
> > tree, so maybe this is a non-issue.
> 
> That doesn't help, sadly.
> 
> I think the best course of action is for Wim to let me know when this
> patch makes it into his tree.  I'll take the MFD one at the same time
> and the two shall meet in -next.
> 
> Honestly, this is all such a faff.
> 
> Just to keep a script happy that 3 people care about.

It's going in today.

Kind regards,
Wim.




[Index of Archives]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux