On 12/6/21 1:05 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 06 Dec 2021, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > >> On 06.12.2021 09:44, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Mon, 06 Dec 2021, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>>> On 15.11.2021 06:53, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>>>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> This helps validating DTS files. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> I'm not familiar with handling multi-subsystem patchsets (here: watchdog >>>> & MFD). >>>> >>>> Please kindly let me know: how to proceed with this patchset now to get >>>> it queued for Linus? >>> >>> What is the requirement for these to be merged together? >> >> If you merge 2/2 without 1/2 then people running "make dt_binding_check" >> may see 1 extra warning until both patches meet in Linus's tree. >> >> So it all comes to how much you care about amount of warnings produced >> by "dt_binding_check". > > In -next, I don't, but I know Rob gets excited about it. > > Rob, what is your final word on this? Is it a forced requirement for > all interconnected document changes to go in together? The first patch is queued up in Guenter's watchdog tree here: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging.git/commit/?h=watchdog-next&id=a5b2ebc8f6e67b5c81023e8bde6b19ff48ffdb02 and will be submitted to Wim shortly I believe, so I suppose we should take patch #2 via Guenter and Wim's tree as well logically. -- Florian
