Re: [PATCH V4 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: convert Broadcom's WDT to the json-schema

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 06 Dec 2021, Rafał Miłecki wrote:

> On 06.12.2021 09:44, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Dec 2021, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> > > On 15.11.2021 06:53, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> > > > From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > 
> > > > This helps validating DTS files.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > I'm not familiar with handling multi-subsystem patchsets (here: watchdog
> > > & MFD).
> > > 
> > > Please kindly let me know: how to proceed with this patchset now to get
> > > it queued for Linus?
> > 
> > What is the requirement for these to be merged together?
> 
> If you merge 2/2 without 1/2 then people running "make dt_binding_check"
> may see 1 extra warning until both patches meet in Linus's tree.
> 
> So it all comes to how much you care about amount of warnings produced
> by "dt_binding_check".

In -next, I don't, but I know Rob gets excited about it.

Rob, what is your final word on this?  Is it a forced requirement for
all interconnected document changes to go in together?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog



[Index of Archives]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux