On Mon, 06 Dec 2021, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 06.12.2021 09:44, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 06 Dec 2021, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > > On 15.11.2021 06:53, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > > > From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > This helps validating DTS files. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > I'm not familiar with handling multi-subsystem patchsets (here: watchdog > > > & MFD). > > > > > > Please kindly let me know: how to proceed with this patchset now to get > > > it queued for Linus? > > > > What is the requirement for these to be merged together? > > If you merge 2/2 without 1/2 then people running "make dt_binding_check" > may see 1 extra warning until both patches meet in Linus's tree. > > So it all comes to how much you care about amount of warnings produced > by "dt_binding_check". In -next, I don't, but I know Rob gets excited about it. Rob, what is your final word on this? Is it a forced requirement for all interconnected document changes to go in together? -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
