On 11/9/21 2:38 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 05.11.2021 16:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> In order to phase out bcm63xx_wdt and use bcm7038_wdt instead, introduce
>> a platform_device_id table that allows both names to be matched.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
>> b/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
>> index 506cd7ef9c77..a8a0e8485125 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
>> @@ -223,8 +223,16 @@ static const struct of_device_id
>> bcm7038_wdt_match[] = {
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, bcm7038_wdt_match);
>> +static const struct platform_device_id bcm7038_wdt_devtype[] = {
>> + { .name = "bcm7038-wdt" },
>> + { .name = "bcm63xx-wdt" },
>> + { /* sentinel */ },
>> +};
>
> I don't think I received answer on this: do we really need or want
> "bcm7038-wdt" there? BCM7038 uses DT so it should never use a platform
> devices created by arch code.
I did not respond to you on that, tested it and turned out we don't need
that bcm7038-wdt string when probed via DT, but we do when probed via
platform_data. Will drop it.
--
Florian
