On 05.11.2021 16:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
In order to phase out bcm63xx_wdt and use bcm7038_wdt instead, introduce a platform_device_id table that allows both names to be matched. Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c index 506cd7ef9c77..a8a0e8485125 100644 --- a/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c +++ b/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c @@ -223,8 +223,16 @@ static const struct of_device_id bcm7038_wdt_match[] = { }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, bcm7038_wdt_match);+static const struct platform_device_id bcm7038_wdt_devtype[] = {+ { .name = "bcm7038-wdt" }, + { .name = "bcm63xx-wdt" }, + { /* sentinel */ }, +};
I don't think I received answer on this: do we really need or want "bcm7038-wdt" there? BCM7038 uses DT so it should never use a platform devices created by arch code.
