Hi Thomas,
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:48 PM Thomas Bogendoerfer
<tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 08:43:51AM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> > in staging and is properly using the pci generic APIs instead of the
> > PCI_LEGACY which seems that all other drivers in 'arch/mips/pci' are
> > using. The driver is generic enough but it needs mips iocu region
> > configuration that is done in the driver itself. So here it is where
> > my questions come. Is 'arch/mips/pci' the place to move this driver?
>
> moving to arch/mips/pci would work for me. Could you look at converting
> the driver to PCI_DRIVERS_GENERIC instead of LEGACY ? I want to
> get rid of PCI_LEGACY...
Driver is already using PCI_DRIVERS_GENERIC, so as soon as I get
bindings validated I will send patches to move into 'arch/mips/pci'.
>
> > Is the driver the correct place to configure the iocu related with
> > pci?
>
> I see no problem with this at the moment.
Ok, good to know :).
>
> Thomas.
>
Thanks,
Sergio Paracuellos
> --
> Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
> good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
