On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 06:16:18PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Wed, 21 Apr 2021, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > > > > We already check the high part of the divident against zero to avoid the > > > > nit-picking: s/divident/dividend/ > > Umm, I find this embarassing (and I hesitated reaching for a dictionary > to double-check the spelling!). Indeed why would this be different from > subtrahend or minuend? > > Thomas, as this mistake has spread across three out of these patches, > both in change descriptions and actual code, would you mind dropping the > series from mips-next altogether and I'll respin the series with all > these issues corrected? I'm sorry, but I don't rebase mips-next and the patches have been pushed out before I received this mail. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
