On Wed, 21 Apr 2021, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > > We already check the high part of the divident against zero to avoid the > > nit-picking: s/divident/dividend/ Umm, I find this embarassing (and I hesitated reaching for a dictionary to double-check the spelling!). Indeed why would this be different from subtrahend or minuend? Thomas, as this mistake has spread across three out of these patches, both in change descriptions and actual code, would you mind dropping the series from mips-next altogether and I'll respin the series with all these issues corrected? Maciej
