On 7/31/20 3:34 AM, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > > > 在 2020/7/31 下午12:24, Florian Fainelli 写道: >> Disable pref 30 by utilizing the standard quirk method and matching the >> affected SoCs: 7344, 7346, 7425. >> >> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/mips/bmips/setup.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/mips/bmips/setup.c b/arch/mips/bmips/setup.c >> index 19308df5f577..df0efea12611 100644 >> --- a/arch/mips/bmips/setup.c >> +++ b/arch/mips/bmips/setup.c >> @@ -110,6 +110,20 @@ static void bcm6368_quirks(void) >> bcm63xx_fixup_cpu1(); >> } >> +static void bmips5000_pref30_quirk(void) >> +{ >> + __asm__ __volatile__( >> + " li $8, 0x5a455048\n" >> + " .word 0x4088b00f\n" /* mtc0 $8, $22, 15 */ >> + " nop; nop; nop\n" >> + " .word 0x4008b008\n" /* mfc0 $8, $22, 8 */ >> + /* disable "pref 30" on buggy CPUs */ >> + " lui $9, 0x0800\n" >> + " or $8, $9\n" >> + " .word 0x4088b008\n" /* mtc0 $8, $22, 8 */ >> + : : : "$8", "$9"); >> +} > Hi, > > Is there any toolchain issue blocking read_c0_**** family helpers being > used? > > Use .word looks unreasonable. Yes, the assembler would be choking on the custom $22 selector, however this patch should not be necessary given that the boot loader (CFE) should have long been updated by now to disable pref 30. Thanks -- Florian