On 02/20/2016 10:33 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> pxa27x_camera is actively maintained, the latest submission request for merge >>> is 11 days ago : >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/789 >>> >>> I can submit a patch in MAINTAINERS if you wish to take it in my bucket. >> >> Please do! That's an easy patch, and then it is clear someone is actively maintaining >> this. > I prepared the patch. > > Now the question is : how will handle the pxa_camera patches, ie. taking them > through his tree ? > > I'm under the impression that Guennadi is very busy, so for the MAINTAINERS > patch as for the next ones, which tree will be handling them ? Moreover as most > probably I will be the biggest contributor, who will be reviewing me ? Guennadi is the soc-camera maintainer. So once pxa_camera no longer uses soc-camera ('independent v4l2 host') it would be me who would review the code and manages patches. BTW, where can I get pxa hardware? It is always nice if I am able to test code as well. But I haven't been able to find a source for this platform. Regards, Hans > We might also pave a path of Guennadi's point (3), ie. have pxa_camera "become > independent V4L2 host". > >> BTW, vb1 refers to videobuf-core.h whereas vb2 refers to its successor videobuf2-core.h >> and videobuf2-v4l2.h. The vb2 framework is vastly superior and integrates nicely with >> dmabuf for buffer sharing between hardware components. > Ok, I'll have a look too. > > Cheers. > > -- > Robert > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
