Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> pxa27x_camera is actively maintained, the latest submission request for merge >> is 11 days ago : >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/789 >> >> I can submit a patch in MAINTAINERS if you wish to take it in my bucket. > > Please do! That's an easy patch, and then it is clear someone is actively maintaining > this. I prepared the patch. Now the question is : how will handle the pxa_camera patches, ie. taking them through his tree ? I'm under the impression that Guennadi is very busy, so for the MAINTAINERS patch as for the next ones, which tree will be handling them ? Moreover as most probably I will be the biggest contributor, who will be reviewing me ? We might also pave a path of Guennadi's point (3), ie. have pxa_camera "become independent V4L2 host". > BTW, vb1 refers to videobuf-core.h whereas vb2 refers to its successor videobuf2-core.h > and videobuf2-v4l2.h. The vb2 framework is vastly superior and integrates nicely with > dmabuf for buffer sharing between hardware components. Ok, I'll have a look too. Cheers. -- Robert -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
