W dniu 21.09.2015 o 18:59, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz pisze: > Hi Hans, > > W dniu 21.09.2015 o 11:50, Hans Verkuil pisze: >> On 18-09-15 16:21, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: >>> From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Add Exynos 5433 jpeg h/w codec node. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi >>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi >> >> This dtsi file doesn't exist in the media-git tree. What is the story >> here? >> >> Should this go through a different subsystem? >> >> I think the media subsystem can take patches 1-3 and whoever does DT >> patches can >> take this patch, right? >> > > The cover letter explains that the series is rebased onto Mauro's > master with Kukjin's branch merged. The latter does contain > the exynos5433.dtsi. That said, yes, taking patches 1-3 in > media subsystem and leaving DT patch to someone else is the > way to go. Although Kukjin picked Exynos 5433 ARM64 patches but they were not accepted upstream by arm-soc. He rolled it for few releases but: 1. Reason for not accepting by arm-soc was not resolved - there is no DTS. 2. Kukjin did not rebase the branch for 4.4... which maybe means that he wants to drop it? 3. Anyone (but me...) can send Galaxy Note4 (Exynos5433) DTS file based on sources on opensource.samsung.com. The DTS there is for 32-bit but it can be probably easily adjusted for ARM64. All of this means that Device Tree support for this driver can't be merged now and effort for mainlining 5433 may be unfortunately wasted... Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
