Hi Hans,
W dniu 21.09.2015 o 11:50, Hans Verkuil pisze:
On 18-09-15 16:21, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Add Exynos 5433 jpeg h/w codec node.
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi
This dtsi file doesn't exist in the media-git tree. What is the story here?
Should this go through a different subsystem?
I think the media subsystem can take patches 1-3 and whoever does DT patches can
take this patch, right?
The cover letter explains that the series is rebased onto Mauro's
master with Kukjin's branch merged. The latter does contain
the exynos5433.dtsi. That said, yes, taking patches 1-3 in
media subsystem and leaving DT patch to someone else is the
way to go.
Andrzej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
