On 06/05/2015 12:25 PM, Antti Palosaari wrote: > On 06/05/2015 12:50 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: >> Hi Antti, >> >> FYI: don't use ATTN as prefix: patchwork doesn't pick that up as a patch, >> and if it doesn't appear there, then it is likely to be forgotten. >> >> Can you repost it with the correct prefix? It's so much easier to process >> for me if it ends up in patchwork... > > Which is correct prefix? Just [PATCH] is enough. > > Earlier I used PATCH RFC, but then I saw that ATTN: > [ANN] Report on the San Jose V4L/DVB mini-summit > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg76281.html > > - Add 'ATTN' inside pull request subject line tp indicate that Mauro's > (or some other maintainer's) attention is required. Should be limited to > api changes, dependencies. > > OK, it speaks only pull request, but that was patchset having API changes... ATTN is only for urgent pull requests for the current rc kernel, it doesn't apply to patches. [PATCH RFC] means that it is not yet ready to be merged, but just [PATCH] indicates that it should be OK to merge (at least according to the submitter!). Regards, Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
