Hi,
On 05/25/2015 02:00 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Hi,
On 23/05/15 14:03, Sakari Ailus wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 03:28:40PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
flash-leds = <&flash_xx &image_sensor_x>, <...>;
One more matter to consider: xenon flash devices.
How about samsung,camera-flashes (and ti,camera-flashes)? After pondering
this awhile, I'm ok with removing the vendor prefix as well.
Let me know what you think.
I thought about it a bit more and I have some doubts about semantics
as above. I'm fine with 'camera-flashes' as far as name is concerned.
Perhaps we should put only phandles to leds or xenon flash devices
in the 'camera-flashes' property. I think it would be more future
proof in case there is more nodes needed to describe the camera flash
(or a camera module) than the above two. And phandles to corresponding
image sensor device nodes would be put in a separate property.
Could you give examples of the cases you are thinking of?
camera-flashes = <&flash_xx>, ...
camera-flash-masters = <&image_sensor_x>, ...
Then pairs at same index would describe a single flash, 0 would indicate
a null entry if needed.
When it should be needed?
Similarly we could create properties for other sub-devices of a camera
module, like lenses, etc.
--
Best Regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
