Hi, On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 02:00:25AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Guennadi, > > On Sunday 15 March 2015 18:56:44 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Mar 2015, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > If the soc-camera host doesn't provide clock start and stop operations > > > registering a v4l2 clock is pointless. Don't do it. > > > > This can introduce breakage only for camera-host drivers, that don't > > provide .clock_start() or .clock_stop(). After your other 3 patches from > > this patch set there will be one such driver in the tree - rcar_vin.c. I > > wouldn't mind this patch as long as we can have an ack from an rcar_vin.c > > maintainer. Since I don't see one in MAINTAINERS, who can ack this? Simon? > > I don't think we have an official maintainer. Maybe a Tested-by would be > enough in this case ? I am quite happy to act as the maintainer of last resort for Renesas IP blocks and to be listed in MAINTAINERS if that is helpful. With regards to testing, I am also happy to help there, though in this case I would appreciate some help with a test case. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html