Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/4] soc-camera: Skip v4l2 clock registration if host doesn't provide clk ops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 02:00:25AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
> 
> On Sunday 15 March 2015 18:56:44 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Mar 2015, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > If the soc-camera host doesn't provide clock start and stop operations
> > > registering a v4l2 clock is pointless. Don't do it.
> > 
> > This can introduce breakage only for camera-host drivers, that don't
> > provide .clock_start() or .clock_stop(). After your other 3 patches from
> > this patch set there will be one such driver in the tree - rcar_vin.c. I
> > wouldn't mind this patch as long as we can have an ack from an rcar_vin.c
> > maintainer. Since I don't see one in MAINTAINERS, who can ack this? Simon?
> 
> I don't think we have an official maintainer. Maybe a Tested-by would be 
> enough in this case ?

I am quite happy to act as the maintainer of last resort for Renesas IP
blocks and to be listed in MAINTAINERS if that is helpful.

With regards to testing, I am also happy to help there, though in this
case I would appreciate some help with a test case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux