Hi,
On 11/24/2014 11:03 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:13:10AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 11/21/2014 09:49 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 04:55:22PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Add a driver for mod0 clocks found in the prcm. Currently there is only
one mod0 clocks in the prcm, the ir clock.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt | 1 +
drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun6i-prcm-mod0.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/mfd/sun6i-prcm.c | 14 +++++
4 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun6i-prcm-mod0.c
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
index ed116df..342c75a 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ Required properties:
"allwinner,sun4i-a10-usb-clk" - for usb gates + resets on A10 / A20
"allwinner,sun5i-a13-usb-clk" - for usb gates + resets on A13
"allwinner,sun6i-a31-usb-clk" - for usb gates + resets on A31
+ "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ir-clk" - for the ir clock on A31
Required properties for all clocks:
- reg : shall be the control register address for the clock.
diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile b/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile
index 7ddc2b5..daf8b1c 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile
@@ -10,4 +10,4 @@ obj-y += clk-sun8i-mbus.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_SUN6I_PRCM) += \
clk-sun6i-ar100.o clk-sun6i-apb0.o clk-sun6i-apb0-gates.o \
- clk-sun8i-apb0.o
+ clk-sun8i-apb0.o clk-sun6i-prcm-mod0.o
diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun6i-prcm-mod0.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun6i-prcm-mod0.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e80f18e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun6i-prcm-mod0.c
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+/*
+ * Allwinner A31 PRCM mod0 clock driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2014 Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+ * (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
+#include <linux/clkdev.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+
+#include "clk-factors.h"
+#include "clk-mod0.h"
+
+static const struct of_device_id sun6i_a31_prcm_mod0_clk_dt_ids[] = {
+ { .compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ir-clk" },
+ { /* sentinel */ }
+};
+
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sun6i_prcm_mod0_lock);
+
+static int sun6i_a31_prcm_mod0_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
+ struct resource *r;
+ void __iomem *reg;
+
+ if (!np)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+ reg = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);
+ if (IS_ERR(reg))
+ return PTR_ERR(reg);
+
+ sunxi_factors_register(np, &sun4i_a10_mod0_data,
+ &sun6i_prcm_mod0_lock, reg);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct platform_driver sun6i_a31_prcm_mod0_clk_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "sun6i-a31-prcm-mod0-clk",
+ .of_match_table = sun6i_a31_prcm_mod0_clk_dt_ids,
+ },
+ .probe = sun6i_a31_prcm_mod0_clk_probe,
+};
+module_platform_driver(sun6i_a31_prcm_mod0_clk_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Allwinner A31 PRCM mod0 clock driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
I don't think this is the right approach, mainly for two reasons: the
compatible shouldn't change, and you're basically duplicating code
there.
I understand that you need the new compatible in order to avoid a
double probing: one by CLK_OF_DECLARE, and one by the usual mechanism,
and that also implies the second reason.
Not only for that, we need a new compatible also because the mfd framework
needs a separate compatible per sub-node as that is how it finds nodes
to attach to the platform devices, so we need a new compatible anyways,
with your make the mod0 clock driver a platform driver solution we could
use:
We have a single mod0 clock in there, so no, not really.
We have a single mod0 clock there today, but who knows what tomorrow brings,
arguably the 1wire clock is a mod0 clock too, so we already have 2 today.
Plus, that seems like a bogus limitation from MFD, and it really
shouldn't work that way.
Well AFAIK that is how it works.
compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ir-clk", "allwinner,sun4i-a10-mod0-clk";
To work around this, but there are other problems, your make mod0clk a
platform driver solution cannot work because the clocks node in the dtsi
is not simple-bus compatible, so no platform-devs will be instantiated for
the clocks there.
Then add the simple-bus compatible.
No, just no, that goes against the whole design of how of-clocks work.
Besides the compatible (which as said we need a separate one anyways),
your other worry is code duplication, but I've avoided that as much
as possible already, the new drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun6i-prcm-mod0.c is
just a very thin wrapper, waying in with all of 63 lines including
16 lines GPL header.
47 lines that are doing exactly the same thing as the other code is
doing. I'm sorry but you can't really argue it's not code duplication,
it really is.
It is not doing the exact same thing, it is a platform driver, where as
the other code is an of_clk driver.
So sorry, I disagree I believe that this is the best solution.
However, as those are not critical clocks that need to be here early
at boot, you can also fix this by turning the mod0 driver into a
platform driver itself. The compatible will be kept, the driver will
be the same.
The only thing we need to pay attention to is how "client" drivers
react when they cannot grab their clock. They should return
-EPROBE_DEFER, but that remains to be checked.
-EPROBE_DEFER is yet another reason to not make mod0-clk a platform
driver. Yes drivers should be able to handle this, but it is a pain,
and the more we use it the more pain it is. Also it makes booting a lot
slower as any driver using a mod0 clk now, will not complete its probe
until all the other drivers are done probing and the late_initcall
which starts the deferred-probe wq runs.
The whole EPROBE_DEFER mechanism might need some fixing, but it's not
really the point is it?
Well one reasons why clocks are instantiated the way they are is to have
them available as early as possible, which is really convenient and works
really well.
You are asking for a whole lot of stuff to be changed, arguably in a way
which makes it worse, just to save 47 lines of code...
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
