Em Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:05:38 +0100 Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 18:54 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Mon, 10 Nov 2014 21:45:56 +0100 > > Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > This typo is still present in both next-20141110 and v3.18-rc4. And I've > > > first reported it nearly two months ago. I see two fixes: > > > 1) s/HAS_MMU/MMU/ > > > 2) s/ || (COMPILE_TEST && HAS_MMU)// > > > > > > Which would you prefer? > > > > Hmm... Probably patchwork didn't get your patch. > > There's no patch, not yet. I try to report stuff like this before > sending patches. The idea here being that the people familiar with the > code tend to fix things better and quicker. > > > IMHO, the best would be: > > > > depends on HAS_MMU > > You really like the HAS_MMU symbol, don't you? I got distracted by your (2) alternative: > > > 2) s/ || (COMPILE_TEST && HAS_MMU)// anyway you got it ;) > > > depends on ARCH_OMAP2 || ARCH_OMAP3 || COMPILE_TEST > > But I understand what you're suggesting here. Should I draft a, probably > untested, patch? Sure. Thanks! Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
