On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 18:54 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Mon, 10 Nov 2014 21:45:56 +0100 > Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > This typo is still present in both next-20141110 and v3.18-rc4. And I've > > first reported it nearly two months ago. I see two fixes: > > 1) s/HAS_MMU/MMU/ > > 2) s/ || (COMPILE_TEST && HAS_MMU)// > > > > Which would you prefer? > > Hmm... Probably patchwork didn't get your patch. There's no patch, not yet. I try to report stuff like this before sending patches. The idea here being that the people familiar with the code tend to fix things better and quicker. > IMHO, the best would be: > > depends on HAS_MMU You really like the HAS_MMU symbol, don't you? > depends on ARCH_OMAP2 || ARCH_OMAP3 || COMPILE_TEST But I understand what you're suggesting here. Should I draft a, probably untested, patch? Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
