Em Sun, 02 Nov 2014 18:30:46 +0900 Akihiro TSUKADA <tskd08@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > Hi, > > After I re-checked the source, > I noticed that dvb_scan_add_entry() also breaks API/ABI compatibility > as well as dvb_new_freq_is_needed(), and those functions are > marked as "ancillary functions used internally inside the library" > in dvb-scan.h. > So I think it would rather be better to move those funcs to a private > header (dvb-scan-priv.h?). > Which way should we go? ver bump/compat-soname.c/dvb-scan-priv.h ? I would keep them exported. It shouldn't be hard to provide a backward compatible function with the same name where the extra parameter would be filled internally, and passed to a new function with one extra argument. Regards, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
