On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:42:57 +0900 Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 02:02:00AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > > On Tuesday 26 August 2014 08:57:20 Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:59:46PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven > > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Mikhail Ulyanov wrote: > > > > > > > > > > + - compatible: should containg one of the following: > > > > > + - "renesas,jpu-r8a7790" for R-Car H2 > > > > > + - "renesas,jpu-r8a7791" for R-Car M2 > > > > > + - "renesas,jpu-gen2" for R-Car second > > > > > generation > > > > > > > > Isn't "renesas,jpu-gen2" meant as a fallback? > > > > > > > > I.e. the DTS should have one of '7790 and '7791, AND the gen2 > > > > fallback, so we can make the driver match against '7790 and > > > > '7791 is we find out about an incompatibility. > > > > > > Is there a document that clearly states that there is such a thing > > > as jpu-gen2 in hardware? If not I would prefer not to add a > > > binding for it. > > > > How about going the other way around and requesting that document ? > > Good idea, I will make a request. Hi Simon, Is there any update on this topic from HW team? If no, should i left it as is? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
