On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 13:40 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 12:17:14PM +0200, Martin Kepplinger wrote: [] > > + if (dev) { > > + dev_dbg(&dev->bus_adap.usb_dev->dev, > > + "tuner parameters: freq: %d bw: 0x%02x gi: 0x%02x\n", > > + params->frequency, > > + tune_args->bandwidth, > > + tune_args->guard_interval); > > + } else { > > + pr_debug("as102: tuner parameters: freq: %d bw: 0x%02x gi: 0x%02x\n", > > params->frequency, > > tune_args->bandwidth, > > tune_args->guard_interval); > > + } [] > This isn't indented correctly. I wish checkpatch.pl would catch that... > Anyway, the else side can be removed as explained earlier. checkpatch doesn't warn on any of: $ cat t.c static int func(void **bar) { bool b; /* test */ int a[2] = { 3, 6 }; if (b) { b = a[0] == a[1]; } return a[b]; } $ I think it'd be better if it would one day but it doesn't seem as simple as it seems for checkpatch to do it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html