On 16 March 2014 23:18, James Hogan <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Fair enough. So changing the minimum rc5-sz masks to 0x3fff sounds reasonable
> to allow toggle to be controlled.
>
> Just to clarify though, so you mean that the remote uses toggle=1 first (and
> in repeat codes) unless you press it a second time (new keypress) within a
> short amount of time?
> I.e. like this?
> Press message toggle=1
> repeat toggle=1
> repeat toggle=1
> unpress
> Press message toggle=!last_toggle only if within X ms, 1 otherwise
>
Actually studying this a little closer it seems that it indeed behaves
like a "toggle":
Press message toggle=1
repeat toggle=1
repeat toggle=1
unpress
Press message toggle=!last_toggle, always
So the toggle is inverted between presses and its value is kept during
repeat. It however seems to behave a little bit sporadically here
tending to set the toggle bit on more often than off.
Anyway I think that allowing the toggle bit to be set in the scancode
does not really hurt. I guess most of the time people will use the
scancodes without the toggle bit.
Br,
-Antti
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
