Hi Hans and Laurent, On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:39:11PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Tuesday 24 September 2013 13:24:25 Hans Verkuil wrote: > > On Tue 24 September 2013 12:59:44 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On Tuesday 10 September 2013 11:34:32 Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > > I have collected all the ideas up to now in a V2 of the agenda. > > > > > > > > The items are grouped by the person(s) that suggested them. As done in > > > > the past those who suggested a topic and who will attend the mini-summit > > > > are expected to prepare for it, perhaps making a (very) small > > > > presentation if necessary. > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > As it stands I don't think it will be possible to handle it all in one > > > > day. In particular the codec problem as mentioned by Oliver et al needs > > > > a lot of time. Should we set aside a separate day for just this? October > > > > 21 or 22 would work for me. I would really like to get some feedback on > > > > this. If we decide to go for a second day for this topic, then I can see > > > > if I can get a room. It looks like there is a lot of interest in getting > > > > this sorted, so brainstorming for a day might be quite useful. > > > > > > I believe a second day would indeed be very useful. As the ARM kernel > > > summit will take place on the 22nd and 23rd, I would vote for > > > brainstorming on the 21st. > > > > I'm working on the agenda and I think we have enough time to go through > > all the items in one day. It would be great if you can be present for either > > the morning or afternoon for the mini-summit. I have about 4 hours worth of > > topics for which your input would be much appreciated. > > The ARM KS agenda hasn't been published yet, so I can't tell when I'll be > available. I've CC'ed you on an e-mail to Olof regarding this. > > > I would be happy to add another brainstorming day, but since Hugues won't be > > available on the 21st we can only do limited codec discussions, so we would > > need other topics as well. Proposals are welcome. Sounds like a good idea to me. I haven't been in the meetings for a while but in the past the tendency has often been that there's more to discuss that what there's time for. > Brainstorming a property-based API is one topic that would benefit from longer > discussions. I'm also always free to discuss CDF and how it would be related What an excellent idea! :) > with V4L2 in the future :-) -- Kind regards, Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx XMPP: sailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
