Hi Guennadi, On Monday 24 June 2013 10:53:35 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jun 2013, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > [snip] > > > > +drivers. > > > + > > > +Bridge drivers in turn have to register a notifier object with an array > > > +of subdevice descriptors, that the bridge device needs for its > > > +operation. This > > > > s/descriptors,/descriptors/ > > > > > +is performed using the v4l2_async_notifier_register() call. To > > > +unregister the notifier the driver has to call > > > +v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(). The > > > +former of the two functions takes two arguments: a pointer to struct > > > +v4l2_device and a pointer to struct v4l2_async_notifier. The latter > > > +contains a pointer to an array of pointers to subdevice descriptors of > > > +type struct v4l2_async_subdev type. > > > > Isn't it the other way around ? > > I don't think I see anything above, that needs to be swapped. What exactly > do you mean? My bad. I got confused by "the latter" (which should be "the later" ;-)) and thought it was referring to the later of the two functions, given that the previous sentence starts with "the former of the two functions". Maybe s/The format of the two functions/The first function/ and s/The latter/The second structure/ ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
