On Wednesday 21 November 2012 09:28:22 Steffen Trumtrar wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 08:35:31PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 07:11:29PM +0100, Robert Schwebel wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:13:19PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 20 November 2012 16:54:50 Steffen Trumtrar wrote: > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > > > Changes since v11: > > > > > - make pointers const where applicable > > > > > - add reviewed-by Laurent Pinchart > > > > > > > > Looks good to me. > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Through which tree do you plan to push this ? > > > > > > We have no idea yet, and none of the people on Cc: have volunteered > > > so far... what do you think? > > > > The customary approach would be to take the patches through separate > > trees, but I think this particular series is sufficiently interwoven to > > warrant taking them all through one tree. However the least that we > > should do is collect Acked-by's from the other tree maintainers. > > > > Given that most of the patches modify files in drivers/video, Florian's > > fbdev tree would be the most obvious candidate, right? If Florian agrees > > to take the patches, all we would need is David's Acked-by. > > > > How does that sound? > > > > Thierry > > Hi! > > That is exactly the way I thought this could happen. Sounds good to me as well. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
