On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 07:11:29PM +0100, Robert Schwebel wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:13:19PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Tuesday 20 November 2012 16:54:50 Steffen Trumtrar wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > Changes since v11: > > > - make pointers const where applicable > > > - add reviewed-by Laurent Pinchart > > > > Looks good to me. > > > > Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Through which tree do you plan to push this ? > > We have no idea yet, and none of the people on Cc: have volunteered > so far... what do you think? The customary approach would be to take the patches through separate trees, but I think this particular series is sufficiently interwoven to warrant taking them all through one tree. However the least that we should do is collect Acked-by's from the other tree maintainers. Given that most of the patches modify files in drivers/video, Florian's fbdev tree would be the most obvious candidate, right? If Florian agrees to take the patches, all we would need is David's Acked-by. How does that sound? Thierry
Attachment:
pgpsgABbaOUih.pgp
Description: PGP signature
