On Fri, 5 Oct 2012, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Fri October 5 2012 11:43:27 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2012, Rob Herring wrote: > > > > > On 10/02/2012 09:33 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > > Hi Rob > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, Rob Herring wrote: > > > > > > > >> On 09/27/2012 09:07 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: [snip] > > > >>> +Optional link properties: > > > >>> +- remote: phandle to the other endpoint link DT node. > > > >> > > > >> This name is a little vague. Perhaps "endpoint" would be better. > > > > > > > > "endpoint" can also refer to something local like in USB case. Maybe > > > > rather the description of the "remote" property should be improved? > > > > > > remote-endpoint? > > > > Sorry, I really don't want to pull in yet another term here. We've got > > ports and links already, now you're proposing to also use "endpoind." > > Until now everyone was happy with "remote," any more opinions on this? > > Actually, when I was reviewing the patch series today I got confused as > well by 'remote'. What about 'remote-link'? Yes, I was thinking about this one too, it looks a bit clumsy, but it does make it clearer, what is meant. > And v4l2_of_get_remote() can be renamed to v4l2_of_get_remote_link() which > I think is a lot clearer. > > The text can be improved as well since this: > > - remote: phandle to the other endpoint link DT node. > > is a bit vague. How about: > > - remote-link: phandle to the remote end of this link. Looks good to me. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
