> > > @@ -445,9 +402,9 @@ static const struct v4l2_subdev_video_ops
> > > adv7180_video_ops = {>
> > > static const struct v4l2_subdev_core_ops adv7180_core_ops = {
> > >
> > > .g_chip_ident = adv7180_g_chip_ident,
> > > .s_std = adv7180_s_std,
> > >
> > > - .queryctrl = adv7180_queryctrl,
> > > - .g_ctrl = adv7180_g_ctrl,
> > > - .s_ctrl = adv7180_s_ctrl,
> > > + .queryctrl = v4l2_subdev_queryctrl,
> > > + .g_ctrl = v4l2_subdev_g_ctrl,
> > > + .s_ctrl = v4l2_subdev_s_ctrl,
> >
> > I'm not sure to undestand this point. I "grepped" for the adv7180
> > and it seem that I'm the only user of the adv7180 (sta2x11 VIP
> > driver). In the VIP driver I don't use the control framework (there
> > aren't controls), so I think these lines must be there. Am I wrong?
>
> Correct. But once sta2x11 is converted to using the control framework,
> then these lines can be dropped since no one else is using this
> subdevice driver.
What do you suggest? I re-submit this patch and when sta2x11 is fixed a
I submit a new patch to remove these lines; or wait the full conversion
of the sta2x11 driver and submit both patch?
--
Federico Vaga
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
