Em 25-05-2012 14:44, Antti Palosaari escreveu:
> On 21.05.2012 06:50, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Em 20-05-2012 17:55, Antti Palosaari escreveu:
>>> I did some more planning and made alternative RFC.
>>> As the earlier alternative was more like changing old functionality that new one goes much more deeper.
>>>
>>> As a basic rule I designed it to reduce stuff from the current struct dvb_usb_device_properties. Currently there is many nested structs introducing same callbacks. For that one I dropped all frontend and adapter level callbacks to device level. Currently struct contains 2 adapters and 3 frontends - which means we have 2 * 3 = 6 "similar" callbacks and only 1 is used. It wastes some space since devices having more than one adapter or frontend are rather rare. Making callback selection inside individual driver is very trivial even without a designated callback. Here is common example from the use of .frontend_attach() callback in case of only one callback used:
>>> static int frontend_attach(struct dvb_usb_adapter *adap)
>>> {
>>> if (adap->id == 0)
>>> return frontend_attach_1();
>>> else
>>> return frontend_attach_2();
>>> }
>>>
>>> Functionality enhancement mentioned earlier RFC are valid too:
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg46352.html
>>>
>>> As I was a little bit lazy I wrote only quick skeleton code to represent new simplified "struct dvb_usb_device_properties":
>>>
>>> struct dvb_usb_device_properties = {
>>> /* download_firmware() success return values to signal what happens next */
>>> #define RECONNECTS_USB (1<< 0)
>>> #define RECONNECTS_USB_USING_NEW_ID (1<< 1)
>>>
>>> .size_of_priv = sizeof(struct 'state'),
>>>
>>> /* firmware download */
>>> .identify_state(struct dvb_usb_device *d, int *cold),
>>> .get_firmware_name(struct dvb_usb_device *d, char *firmware_name),
>>> .download_firmware(struct dvb_usb_device *d, const struct firmware *fw),
>>> .allow_dynamic_id = true,
>>>
>>> .power_ctrl(struct dvb_usb_device *d, int onoff),
>>> .read_config(struct dvb_usb_device *d, u8 mac[6]),
>>> .get_adapter_count(struct dvb_usb_device *d, int *count),
>>>
>>> .frontend_attach(struct dvb_usb_adapter *adap),
>>> .tuner_attach(struct dvb_usb_adapter *adap),
>>>
>>> .init(struct dvb_usb_device *d),
>>>
>>> .get_rc(struct dvb_rc *),
>>> .i2c_algo = (struct i2c_algorithm),
>>>
>>> .frontend_ctrl(struct dvb_frontend *fe, int onoff),
>>> .get_stream_props(struct usb_data_stream_properties *),
>>> .streaming_ctrl(struct dvb_usb_adapter *adap, int onoff),
>>>
>>> .generic_bulk_ctrl_endpoint = (int),
>>> .generic_bulk_ctrl_endpoint_response = (int),
>>>
>>> .devices = (struct dvb_usb_device)[],
>>> };
>>>
>>> struct dvb_usb_device dvb_usb_devices {
>>> char *name = "name",
>>> .rc_map = RC_MAP_EMPTY,
>>> .device_id = (struct usb_device_id),
>>> }
>>
>> It looks OK to me. It may make sense to add an optional
>> per-device field, to allow drivers to add more board-specific
>> information, if they need, in order to avoid duplicating
>> things there.
>>
>> Another option would be for the drivers to do:
>>
>> struct dvb_usb_drive_foo dvb_usb_driver_foo {
>> struct dvb_usb_device dvb_usb_devices dvb_usb_dev;
>> int foo;
>> long bar;
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> And, inside the core, use the container_of() macro to go from
>> the device-specific table to struct dvb_usb_device.
>>
>> This way, simple drivers can do just:
>>
>> struct dvb_usb_drive_foo dvb_usb_driver_foo {
>> struct dvb_usb_device dvb_usb_devices dvb_usb_dev;
>> }
>>
>> And complex drivers can add more stuff there.
>
> I have now implemented some basic stuff. Most interesting is new way of map device id and properties for it. I found that I can use .driver_info field from the (struct usb_device_id) to carry pointer. I used it to carry all the other data to the DVB USB core. Thus that one big issue is now resolved. It reduces something like 8-9 kB of binary size which is huge improvement. Same will happen for every driver using multiple (struct dvb_usb_device_properties) - for more you are used more you save.
>
> Here is 3 example drivers I have converted to that new style:
> http://palosaari.fi/linux/v4l-dvb/dvb-usb-2012-05-25/
It will be better if you inline a diff at the email, instead of pointing
to the changed files.
Also, instead of doing:
static struct usb_device_id af9015_usb_table[] = {
{ USB_DEVICE(USB_VID_AFATECH, USB_PID_AFATECH_AF9015_9015),
.driver_info = (kernel_ulong_t) &((struct dvb_usb_driver_info) {
.name = "Afatech AF9015 reference design",
.props = &af9015_properties })},
I suggest you to add a macro for it, converting the above to something similar to:
DVB_USB_DRIVER_INFO("Afatech AF9015 reference design", &af9015_properties),
or, even better, to:
DVB_USB_DEVICE(USB_VID_AFATECH,
USB_PID_AFATECH_AF9015_9015,
"Afatech AF9015 reference design",
&af9015_properties),
Btw, I still think that you should move things like RC type to be stored outside
the properties struct.
Regards,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
