On 21.05.2012 03:36, VDR User wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Devin Heitmueller
<dheitmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If you think this is important, then you should feel free to submit
patches to Antti's tree. Otherwise, this is the sort of optimization
that brings so little value as to not really be worth the engineering
effort. The time is better spent working on problems that *actually*
have a visible effect to users (and a few extra modules being loaded
does not fall into this category).
I think you'll find after spending a few hours trying to abstract out
the logic and the ugly solution that results that it *really* isn't
worth it.
So you think that it makes more sense to ignore existing issues rather
than fix them. Isn't fixing issues& flaws the whole point of an
overhaul/redesign? Yes, it is. I do get the point you're trying to
make -- there are bigger fish to fry. But this is not an urgent
project and I disagree with the attitude to just disregard whatever
you deem unimportant. If you're going to do it, do it right.
I am not sure what you trying to say. Do you mean I should try to get
remote controller totally optional module which can be left out?
How much memory will be saved if remote can be left out as unloaded?
regards
Antti
--
http://palosaari.fi/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
