On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 07:07:38PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:06 PM, <volokh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> One question... shouldn't this changeset be splitted into shorter patches? > >> > > > > Yes, should it. > > In next iteration i`ll learn how to do that. > > As a git newbie I've found very useful to work like this: > > 1. Always work on a branch that's different from master > that way you can always do > > git-rebase --interactive master > > and quickly review your commits or even rewrite them. > > 2. If unsure on changeset, add files interactively > to stage area (aka the index) with > > git-add --patch > > 3. Once you've commit a few stuff, you can simply > turn them into patches with > > git-format-patch master. > > This way it's very easy to split a change into patches. > And with git rebase it's very easy to review and clean > commits, to get a cleaner set of patches to keep > maintainers happy. > > Just my two cents, > Hope it helps, > Ezequiel. OOh! Very thanks for good idea! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
