Hi Kristof, On Monday 23 January 2012 17:31:13 Csillag Kristof wrote: > At 2012-01-23 15:41, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > I think your best bet is still UVC + H.264, as that's what the market is > > moving to. Any other compressed format (except for MJPEG) will likely be > > proprietary. > > > > As you correctly mention, H.264 support isn't available yet in the UVC > > driver. Patches are welcome ;-) > > So... do I understand it correctly that with the current hw/sw stack, my > original requirements can not be satisfied? Not that I'm aware of. > In that case, let's try with reduced requirements. What if I give up HD > resolution and H264? > > Is there a camera that can provide a HW-compressed 480p video stream, in > MPEG-2 or something like that? I don't think so. Once again, unless you can work with MJPEG, your best bet is UVC and H.264. But you will need to write the code (or find someone who can write it). -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
