Re: v4l-utils migrated to autotools

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 18 January 2012 13:31:01 Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:19:24 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> 
> <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Not sure if it is possible, but it would be great if the build
> > output would be less verbose. libtool adds a lot of additional
> > (generally
> 
> useless)
> 
> > messages, with makes harder to see the compilation warnings in the
> > middle of all those garbage.
> 
> These days, automake has a silent mode that looks much like a kernel
> compilation.

I missed the first message of this thread, that's why I hijacked it here 
and it is short:

I love cmake and can't understand why people are not preferring it over 
autotools for user-space applications and conditional+configurable 
builds. 

I hope my mail is not too off-topic.

regards,
--
Patrick Boettcher

Kernel Labs Inc.
http://www.kernellabs.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux