On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Eddi De Pieri <eddi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi to all, > > with latest git, w_scan partially working only if adding -t2 or t3. > > It seems that scan quality of w_scan is lower if compared to dvb_app scan Hi Eddi, A really useful test would be to run the exact same scan twice in a row and see if you get consistent results (in terms of the number of frequencies are found and which ones). It would be worthwhile to know if there's a consistent problem locking to certain frequencies, or whether you get a lock for any given frequency is random. Run the scan with the exact same parameters again and see if you get the same results. Such information will drive whether the developers need to investigate why certain frequencies always fail to lock, or whether there is a more general problem with tuning that results in lock failure regardless of frequency. Devin -- Devin J. Heitmueller - Kernel Labs http://www.kernellabs.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
