Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?
From: Andreas Oberritter <obi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:56:24 +0100
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>, HoP <jpetrous@xxxxxxxxx>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20111207161058.GC22355@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111124 Thunderbird/8.0

On 07.12.2011 17:10, Mark Brown wrote:
> a simple loopback in the style of FUSE which
> bounces the kernel APIs up to userspace for virtual drivers would make
> sense.

That's exactly what vtunerc is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?
  - From: Florian Fainelli
- Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?
  - From: HoP
- Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?
  - From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
- Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?
  - From: Andreas Oberritter
- Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?
  - From: Mark Brown
- Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?
  - From: Andreas Oberritter
- Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?
  - From: Mark Brown
- Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?
  - From: Andreas Oberritter
- Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?
  - From: Mark Brown
- Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?
  - From: Andreas Oberritter
- Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?
  - From: Mark Brown

Prev by Date: [PATCH v2] media: vb2: vmalloc-based allocator user pointer handling
Next by Date: Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?
Next by thread: Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Input] [Video for Linux] [Gstreamer Embedded] [Mplayer Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [Yosemite Backpacking]