On 06.12.2011 12:18, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 10:20:03PM +0100, Andreas Oberritter wrote: >> On 05.12.2011 21:55, Alan Cox wrote: >>> The USB case is quite different because your latency is very tightly >>> bounded, your dead device state is rigidly defined, and your loss of >>> device is accurately and immediately signalled. > >>> Quite different. > >> How can usbip work if networking and usb are so different and what's so >> different between vtunerc and usbip, that made it possible to put usbip >> into drivers/staging? > > USB-IP is a hack that will only work well on a tightly bounded set of > networks - if you run it over a lightly loaded local network it can > work adequately. This starts to break down as you vary the network > configuration. I see. So it has problems that vtunerc doesn't have. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
