On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Em 14-11-2011 17:39, Manu Abraham escreveu: >> On 11/12/11, Andreas Oberritter <obi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 11.11.2011 23:38, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >>>> Em 11-11-2011 20:07, Manu Abraham escreveu: >>>>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab >>>>> <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> Em 11-11-2011 04:26, Manu Abraham escreveu: >>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab >>>>>>> <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>> Em 10-11-2011 13:30, Manu Abraham escreveu: >>>>>>> The purpose of the patch is to >>>>>>> query DVB delivery system capabilities alone, rather than DVB frontend >>>>>>> info/capability. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Attached is a revised version 2 of the patch, which addresses the >>>>>>> issues that were raised. >>>>>> >>>>>> It looks good for me. I would just rename it to DTV_SUPPORTED_DELIVERY. >>>>>> Please, when submitting upstream, don't forget to increment DVB version >>>>>> and >>>>>> add touch at DocBook, in order to not increase the gap between API specs >>>>>> and the >>>>>> implementation. >>>>> >>>>> Ok, thanks for the feedback, will do that. >>>>> >>>>> The naming issue is trivial. I would like to have a shorter name >>>>> rather that SUPPORTED. CAPS would have been ideal, since it refers to >>>>> device capability. >>>> >>>> CAPS is not a good name, as there are those two CAPABILITIES calls there >>>> (well, currently not implemented). So, it can lead in to some confusion. >>>> >>>> DTV_ENUM_DELIVERY could be an alternative for a short name to be used >>>> there. >>> >>> I like "enum", because it suggests that it's a read-only property. >>> >>> DVB calls them "delivery systems", so maybe DTV_ENUM_DELSYS may be an >>> alternative. >> >> This is a bit more sensible and meaningful than the others. I like >> this one better than the others. >> >> Attached is a version 3 patch which addresses all the issues that were raised > > Ok from my side. A minor issue is that we've renamed the cmd, but the > internal function name was the same: > > dtv_set_default_delivery_caps() > > Anyway, ACK from my side. > Ok, thanks. > I'll merge it upstream when you submit the DocBook patches (or send me a git > pull request with both things - whatever work better for you). Those xml docs seem to have some issue ? I get this following error on opening the docs: XML error while loading the document: The markup in the document following the root element must be well formed. at line3 Regards, Manu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html