On Thursday 20 Oct 2011 07:45:45 Jyrki Kuoppala wrote: > I think my problem frequency has also been at the later spot. It is possible > there is something more complicated going on at 474 MHz - so based on your > testing, it's best to apply just the latter change, at least for now. > > Jyrki > > > > + else if (freq< 546000000) rd[15].val = 0xd6; /* 546 MHz */ > > + else if (freq< 546000000) rd[15].val = 0xd6; /* 546 MHz */ Are you going to resubmit the patch with just these changes (you can add my Tested-by to that), or if you want, I can take care of resubmitting it? -Carlos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html