Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Sakari Ailus wrote:
Hi Guennadi,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 04:56:11PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
@@ -2099,6 +2103,15 @@ struct v4l2_dbg_chip_ident {
__u32 revision; /* chip revision, chip specific */
} __attribute__ ((packed));
+/* VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS */
+struct v4l2_create_buffers {
+ __u32 index; /* output: buffers index...index + count - 1 have been created */
+ __u32 count;
+ enum v4l2_memory memory;
+ struct v4l2_format format; /* "type" is used always, the rest if sizeimage == 0 */
+ __u32 reserved[8];
+};
What about the kerneldoc comments you wrote right after v6 on 1st September
for v4l2_create_buffers and the same for the compat32 version?
Looks like someone is trying very hard to cause me a heart failure;-) They
are in a separate patch:
No, I don't! :-) I'm just interested all the appropriate changes are in
the patchset. My understanding was you intended to add these changes to
the original patches.
Are you planning to put them to the same patchset still, or a different one?
Cheers,
--
Sakari Ailus
sakari.ailus@xxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
