On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 04:56:11PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > @@ -2099,6 +2103,15 @@ struct v4l2_dbg_chip_ident {
> > __u32 revision; /* chip revision, chip specific */
> > } __attribute__ ((packed));
> >
> > +/* VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS */
> > +struct v4l2_create_buffers {
> > + __u32 index; /* output: buffers index...index + count - 1 have been created */
> > + __u32 count;
> > + enum v4l2_memory memory;
> > + struct v4l2_format format; /* "type" is used always, the rest if sizeimage == 0 */
> > + __u32 reserved[8];
> > +};
>
> What about the kerneldoc comments you wrote right after v6 on 1st September
> for v4l2_create_buffers and the same for the compat32 version?
Looks like someone is trying very hard to cause me a heart failure;-) They
are in a separate patch:
http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/338/
and let's leave it that way.
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
